A JUSTIABLE REMEDY TO REMOVE THE ANOMALY OF A SEPOY GETTING MORE PENSION THAN A NAIK AND HAVILDAR OF SAME GROUP AMD SAME LENGTH OF SERVICE AS PER CDA CIR 430.
Existing pension as per VI th Pay commission- CDA circular-430
Rank Group Qly.Service pension Table.No as per Cir 430
SEP A,X 15 5368 1
NK A X 15 5290` 11
HAV A,X 15 5355 21
This anomaly may be removed by a simple formula by increasing the weightage
given to NK and HAV by just ONE year. That is:
Weightage for Naik…… 9 years instead of 8 years
For HAV….. 7 years instead of 6 years.
NOTIONAL FITMENT FORMULA : ON MAX SCALE OF PAY AS ON 10-10-1997.
For Naik…….Group A,X… scale of pay …. 3700-85-4975
Maximumof pay….4975 x fitment factor 1.86=9353 rounded to ten= 9360 + GP +MSP
+ X Group pay = 9360+2400+200+1400=15160
Full pension= 50% of pay= 15160/2=7580
Weight age- 9yrs Prorata pension……..7580x(15+9)24/33=5512
Pension of Naik will be Rs.5512
For the Rank of Havildar: Group A,X ---Scale of pay= 4150 – 100 – 5650
Maximum of pay= 5650 x fitment factor 1.86=10509 rounded to ten= 10510 +Gp+
Msp + X gp. Full Pay = 10510+2800+2000+1400=16710
Full pension 50% of pay= 16710/2=8355
Weightage for HAV-7yrs Prorata pension= 8355x(15+7)22/33=5570
Pension of a Havildar- Rs 5570
In this method, a Naik and Havildar will be getting more than a Sepoy pension,
thus there will be no anomaly.
Our suggestion may be taken in the right spirit and considered for favorable