WHAT IS YOUR CONTRIBUTION FOR GETTING O.R.O.P.?

WHAT IS YOUR CONTRIBUTION FOR GETTING O.R.O.P.? HAVE YOU JOINED IN ANY DHARNA ANY WHERE ? WITHOUT SHOWING OUR PAIN WE WILL NOT GET ANY GAIN. JOIN I.E.S.M. AND FIGHT FOR O.R.O.P. THINK IT OVER AND JOIN IMMEDIATELY FOR O.R.O.P.

UNITY IS OUR STRENGTH

DEAR VETERANS
OUR UNITY IS VERY IMPORTANT
PLEASE HELP THE POOR JAWANS

THEY ARE MORE IN NUMBER

BRING THEM UNDER YOUR COMMAND
BY LOVE & COMPASSION
THEN YOU SEE HOW
THINGS MOVE WITH THE GOVT


PLEASE THINK IT OVER

@@@@@@

KNOW THE RATES OF DISABILITY PENSIONS

W.E.F.01.01.2006

(FOR PRE 01.01.06)(100%)
READ CDA CIRCULAR 456
JCOs (FOR 100%)
READ CIRCULAR 456
OTHER RANKS (FOR 100%)
READ CIRCULAR 456

WAR INJURY PENSION
FOR ALL RANKS (100%)
READ CDA CIRCULAR 456

DISABILITY PENSION &
WAR INJURY PENSION
TO BE PAID WITH D.A.

CONSTANT ATTENDANCE ALLOWANCE
FOR ALL RANKS (FOR 100%)
Rs.3750/-W.E.F. 01.01.2011

MINIMUM SPECIAL FAMILY PENSION
Rs.7000/- W.E.F.01.01.2006

@@@@@

IT IS BETTER TO KNOW

YOUR PENSION ENTITLEMENTS THAN

YOUR LIQUOR QUOTA

HELP ALL TO GET
CORRECT PENSION FROM BANKS

REMEMBER, THAT OUR DEMAND OF

ONE RANK ONE PENSION

STILL NOT ACCEPTED BY GOVT.

20,000 MEDALS SURRENDERED

OUR FIGHT CONTINUES

JOIN THE MISSION TO WIN

THERE IS NO GAIN WITHOUT PAIN

LET US FIGHT FOR JUSTICE
OROP MEANS
EQUAL PENSION
FOR EQUAL RANK
GROUP,AND SERVICE
IRRESPECTIVE OF DATE
OF RETIREMENT
WHETHER POST 01.01.2006
OR PRE 01.01.2006

@@@@@@@@

RECENT JUDGEMENT - AFT KOCHI

WIDOW OF A RE-EMPLOYED EXSM

ENTITLED FOR DUAL FAMILY PENSION


"நல்ல நிர்வாகத்தால் வழங்கப்படும்

நீதி தான் உயர்ந்தது.

நீதி மன்றங்களினால் பெறப்படும் நீதிகள்

நிர்வாகத்துக்கு பெரும் அவமானம்

என்பதை நிர்வாகம்

(Ministry of Defence)

நன்கு உணர வேண்டும்."

தகுதியுள்ள விதவைகளுக்கு உடனே

இரண்டு குடும்ப பென்ஷன் வழங்க வேண்டும்

முன்னாள் படை வீரர் குடும்பங்களின்

நலன் காப்பது ராணுவ அமைச்சகத்தின்

தலையாய கடமையாகும்

@@@@@@

Disclaimer

The postings in this Blog are only the personal opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of the “indianexserviceman” blog team. These are expressed in good faith for the general welfare of the veterans of the Indian Armed Forces. The contents of this blog are neither for business nor for any commercial gains. Neither the “indianexserviceman” blog team nor the individual authors of any material on this blog accept responsibility for any loss or damage however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this blog. All views and opinions presented are solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of “indianexserviceman” blog team. This is not an official blog site. This blog is run by a team of Air Warriors of the IAF (Veterans). It is not affiliated to or officially recognized by the MOD or AHQ or Air HQ or Govt/State or any other organization.

"நாட்டுக்காக உயிர் நீத்தவர்களை நினைக்காதநாடு இனி யாரும் அதற்காக உயிர் விடும் தகுதியை இழந்துவிடும்."

PENSION GUIDE BOOK IN HINDI AVAILABLE FREE DOWNLOAD. CLICK HERE.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

MESSAGE FOR READERS

"இராணுவ பென்சனர்களுக்கு ஓர் வழிகாட்டி" என்ற புத்தகம் புதிய பென்சன் பட்டியலுடன் கிடைக்கிறது. ஒவ்வொரு ராணுவ பென்சனரும் அவசியம் படிக்கவேண்டியது. உங்கள் தேவைக்கு தொடர்புகொள்ள : முகவரி "எக்ஸ் வெல் டிரஸ்ட் " 15 மிலிடரி லைன், சமாதானபுரம், திருநெல்வேலி 627002. போன்:9894152959. 04622575380 தெரிந்து கொள்வது அவசியம். தெரியாது என்பது அவமானம். தெரிந்து கொள்வது கௌரவம்.உங்கள் சரியான பென்சனை தெரிந்துகொள்ள இந்த புத்தகம் உதவும்.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

JUDGEMENT OF THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH


Bloggergentle said...

The Chandigarh bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal has directed the Union government to grant one rank one pension or the same pension to personnel belonging to the same rank, irrespective of the date of retirement.

Deciding on the cases of Babu Ram Dhiman vs Union of India and Sohan Singh vs Union of India, the tribunal on Monday said, “It is quite clear that the State cannot lay down different criteria for grant of pension for same rank of officers and Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR) on the basis of the cut-off date of retirement. All pensioners, irrespective of the date of retirement are entitled to (the) same pension.”

The judgment also said grant of unequal pay in the same rank was a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution that grants equal rights to all citizens.
The All India Ex-Servicemen’s Welfare Association, Chandigarh, under its legal aid scheme, filed these two cases seeking a direction to the Ministry of Defence to revise the pension of those who retired before January 2006 to put them on par with post-September 2008 pensioners.

Bhim Sen Sehgal, chairman of the association and Rajesh Sehgal, petitioners’ counsel, submitted that a Havildar who retired before January 2006 gets a pension of Rs 4,060 per month while those retiring after September 2008 get Rs 7,846. Similar are the cases of equivalent ranks of the Army, Navy and Air Force, they said.

Amar Preet Sandhu, the central government’s lawyer maintained that the matter was under the government's consideration.
The above news is copied from Hindustan Times Chandigarh edition dated 08 March,2009 published on line at 2349 hrs.How Govt reacts to this is to to be watched with concern by the Ex-servicemen fraternity.But there is a silver lining behind every cloud !

Good luck & best wishes to all the readers!!
With regards to all Veteran brothers/sisters.
SKS (Veteran)

Thanks to "Gentle" for giving a valuable information.(C.Muthukrishnan)

7 comments:

gentle said...

The new pension rules for our veteran brothers up to the JCO & Eqvt level based on the recommendations of Secretary committee are finally out & accessible to all the interested veterans having computer access.
In this connection I would like to bring out my comments published earlier in this blog which are copied & placed below.
The revised pension per the proposal of secretary would most likely be for X group with 33 years of service including weightage:

Sepoy 50% of 14050 = 7025
Naik 50 % of 15060 =7530
Havildar 50 % of 16710 =8355
Naib Subedar 50 % of 23020 =11510
Subedar 50 % of 26210 = 13105
Sub Major 50 % of 26900 = 13450
EO&E
You may verify these figures from the table in 6th pay commision report , modified by the secretaries Report.The formula for my calculation was given in my earlier comments.
Regards & best wishes .
SKS
I should bring out here that my calculation was slightly different for the ranks of Sepoy ,Naik & Havildar due to my omission of element of Classification pay/allowance of Rs 120/- thereby showing a discrepancy of Rs 60/- in my figures arrived at.However ,the figures in respect of Nb Subedar ,Subedar & Sub Major are correctly calculated by me as compared to the figures appearing in the table for army veterans in group X at 30 Years plus service.
Now it would be interesting to compare the pension if it was granted @70% of the minimum of the pay band as per the scale approved by the Govt.
The amount of pension based on 70% of the minimum pay band is placed below for comparison with the amount now approved by the Govt:
Sepoy : 70% of (5200+2000 grade pay+2000 MSP +1400 Group X pay +150 of Classification pay=10750x70%=7525 while the presnt pension approve is 7085.
Naik:5200+2400+2000+1400+120=11120x70%=7784 compared to 7590 approved pension.
Havildar: 5200+2800+2000+1400+120=11520
x70%=8064 compared to 8064 approved pension
Nb Sub.:9300+4200+2000+1400=16900
x70%=11830 compared to Rs 11510 approved pension.
Subedar: 9300+4600+2000+1400=17300
x70%=12110 compared to Rs 13105 approved pension.
Sub. Major: 9300+4800+2000+1400=17500
x70%=12250 compared to Rs 13450
I would leave it to the readers to make their own assessment of what is sanctioned as compared to OROP if sanctioned as envisaged by us.
Therefore please do NOT be misguided by the PSEUDO LEADERS who claim that OROP suits only OFFICERS & not all the veterans.Of course I did not calculate the pension of say Havildar who retires post 2006 with 30 years of service. Just imagine what would be his pension while he is placed in pay band as on 01 jan 2006 at say 26/27 years of service & his pension amount in comparison with a Havildar with the same length of service but who retired before 01 Jan 2006.
I leave it your judgement to reconcile to the present state of your pension in case you had retired before Jan 2006 or aspire & fight for OROP.
With best wishes to all the veterans & hope that I could make you realize what you should aspire for & why.
SKS( Veteran)

gentle said...

I wish to correct the typing error in my above post for the rank of Havildar. It should read as 8064 compared to Rs 8415 approved pension.
Thanks for publishing my comments.
With regards,
SKS (Veteran)

Chennai guru said...

sir, I am Ex cpl Suresh Babu >R My case against IAF regarding promotion to GpX sgt with retrospective monetary benefits, Now the case have been transfered to AFT chennai , Kindly pl forward some case /judgments of reinstatement and monetary benefits due to service faults and policy drawbacks

ranjit said...

Sir,

1. Reference PCDA (Pension) circular No 430 dated 10 Mar 2010.

2. With due respect and humble submission I beg to state that I JC-429433-N Nb Sub Clk Nirmal Singh (Group Y) had served in Indian Army for 26 years and discharge from service wef 01 Apr 2006 with pensionary benefits vide PPO No S/051412/2005 (Army). As per the provisions of 6th Pay Commission my service pension has been revised to Rs 8590/- vide PPO No S/CORR/193260 (photocopy attached). As per table No 32 of PCDA (Pension) circular No 430 (photocopy attached) , pension of a Nb Sub (Group Y) having been served for 26 years service prior to 01 Jan 2006 has been fixed Rs 10029/- pm wef 01 Jul 2009 which needs to be elucidated

3. Sir, in view of the above it is apparent that a Nb Sub retired prior to 01 Jan 2006 is getting more pension than the Nb Sub retired after 01 Jan 2006. The same thing has happened with most of the Nb Subedars and Subedars retired after 01 Jan 2006. Sir, this point is concerned with welfare of post 01 Jan 2006 pensioners and needs due consideration at your level.

4. I hope to hear positive response from you to get this anomaly rectified at the earliest.

Thanking you.






(Ex Nb Sub Clk Nirmal Singh District Sainik Welfare Office Shashtri Market, Jalandhar-144001 Mobile No-098762-31422 Email – nirmal_raji@yahoo.com

COL LAMBA said...

TOO HOOTS FOR COL [SELECTION] /BRIG/MAJ GEN AND BOOZE ,PAY,PERKS FOR GENERALS[LT GEN & COAS]
BAND BY QMG BRANCH FOR CSD LIQOUR/CSD-WHAT A BRAIN WAVE?
Officers' Band-1: Hony Lt, Hony Capt, Lieut to Colonel-10 BOTTLES
Officers' Band-2: Brig and Maj Gen-12 BOTTLES
Officers' Band-3: Lt Gen -16 BOTTLES
UNSPECIFIED OFFICER Officers' Band-: COAS- UNLIMITED
1. HONY LT/CAPT IS JCO.
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH CHANDIGARH OA 345 of 2010 – OA 216 of 2011 – OA 884 of 2010 – OA 149 of 2010 – Petitioners
ORDER – 28 APR 2011 EXTRACT
This aspect of status rank and precedence is embodied in Regulation 178 of the Defence Services Regulations, Regulations for the Army 1986 which reads as under -
• The status of a JCO as such is not affected by the grant to him the honorary rank of Lieutenant and Captain, nor does the commission granting him that rank conferred any additional powers of command.
• Such Honorary Commissioned officers will take rank according to their junior commissioned rank and will accordingly be junior to all officers. the respondents are directed to fix/ re-fix the minimum pay correspondingly the pension of pre 01.01.2006 retired Captains (equivalents ranks in the Navy and Air Forces), including the petitioners by taking the minimum of the fixed for Captains as on 01.01.2006.
Such fixation shall not in any case be less than that granted to JCOs holding honorary commission of Captains.
The above directions are implemented within four months of receipt of copy of the order.
Sd/- Justice Ghanshyam Prasad
Sd/ Lt Gen NS Brar (Retd)
2. HONORARY COMMISSIONED OFFICER ARE JCO’S & JUNIOR TO REGULAR OFFICER LT/CAPT. BUT IN 6TH CPC HONORARY OFFICER[CLASS-II] HAVE BEEN EQUATED TO CLASS-I OFFICER BY PLACING THEM IN PB-3 ] DISGRACE TO REGULAR LT & CAPT
3. A GRAVE BLUNDER WHICH WILL POSE ,ADMINSTRATIVE,COMMAND & CONTROL, LEGAL, FINANCIAL & LOWERING MORALE OF REGULAR OFFICER]
4. QMG HAS INSULTED OFFICER CADRE,BUT HAS ALSO INCURRED HUGE LOSS TO THE NATION THEIR IS EVASION OF EXCISE DUTY ON LIQUOR , WHICH HAS BEEN LOST &ADDITIONAL LOSS IN CSD ITEMS AS QUOTA THE PERSON INVOLVED FROM DRAFTING TO SANCTION OF LETTER[QMG] SHOULD BE PUNISHED & LOSS BE RECOVERED FROM THEIR PAY & LLOWANCES LIKE SUKHANA SCAM .
5. THE FORMATION/UNITS WHO HAVE IMPLEMENTED THE ORDER WITHOUT CONTESTING ARE ALSO PARTY TO IT
6. ONLY TWO BANDS: FOR OFFICERS
ACCN HAS TWO BANDS UP TO MAJORS [NOW LT COL DUE TO UP GRADATION OF RANK] & MAJORS & ABOVE
PAY OFFICERS HAS ALSO TWO BANDS LT TO LT COL &COL TO GEN
THAN WHY NOT HAVE TWO BANDS FOR CANTEEN/CLUB EXTRA
Officers' Band-1 : LT TO LT COL [NON RED TAPE OFFICER]NON HAG SCALE
Officers' Band-2 : COL[SELECTION] TO Gen [ RED TAPE OFFICER]HAG SCALE
7. NOW LET SEE BAND WISE:
A] Officers’ Band-1: Hony Lt, Hony Capt, Lieut to Colonel-
JCO [CLASS-II] [HONY LT/CAPT] HAS NOT ONLY BEEN EQUATED WITH CLASS-I OFFICER BUT AN OFFICER HIGHER TO SUPER TIME SCALE [COL-SELECTION] HAS ALSO BEEN EQUATED WITH JCO [HONY LT/CAPT]
B] Officers’ Band-2: Brig and Maj Gen-
A LT GEN DOES NOT THINK A MAJ GEN/BRIG IS WORTH WHILE TO BE IN HIS BAND
C] Officers’ Band-3: Lt Gen –
COAS NOT COMFORTABLE WITH LT GEN, HIGHER SCALE FROM MAJ GEN.
D] UNSPECIFIED UNLIMITED OFFICER BAND 4: COAS-
NOT SUFFICENT OOH LESS [LOVE FOR WINE xxx W
8. HAND FULL OF GENERALS ARE SNATCHING AWAY PAY, PERKS & DIGNITY OF SELECTION GRADE OFFICER’S [COL& BRIG]. ARE THEY BENT ON IN MAKING A COWARD, UNFIT ARMY, WITH POOR COMMAND & CONTROL SET UP [BY DENYING COL[SELECTION] & BRIG THEIR DUE]
9. THERE IS IMMEDIATE NEED TO REVISE THE PAY/PENSION OF selection GRADE COL/BRIG w.e.f. 1/1/2006.THEY HAVE TO BE KEPT ABOVE SUPER TIME SCALE TO MAINTAIN THEIR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF EQUALITY & NOT TO VIOLATE ARTICLE 14 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
PLACE COL [SELECTION] w.e.f IN ABOVE SUPER TIME SCALE OF IAS/IPS & RESTORE DIGNITY & HONOUR OF COMMANDING OFFICER COL [SELECTION GRADE] A KING PIN OF FIGHTING MACHINERY

COL LAMBA said...

TOO HOOTS FOR COL [SELECTION] /BRIG/MAJ GEN AND BOOZE ,PAY,PERKS FOR GENERALS[LT GEN & COAS]
BAND BY QMG BRANCH FOR CSD LIQOUR/CSD-WHAT A BRAIN WAVE?
Officers' Band-1: Hony Lt, Hony Capt, Lieut to Colonel-10 BOTTLES
Officers' Band-2: Brig and Maj Gen-12 BOTTLES
Officers' Band-3: Lt Gen -16 BOTTLES
UNSPECIFIED OFFICER Officers' Band-: COAS- UNLIMITED
1. HONY LT/CAPT IS JCO.
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH CHANDIGARH OA 345 of 2010 – OA 216 of 2011 – OA 884 of 2010 – OA 149 of 2010 – Petitioners
ORDER – 28 APR 2011 EXTRACT
This aspect of status rank and precedence is embodied in Regulation 178 of the Defence Services Regulations, Regulations for the Army 1986 which reads as under -
• The status of a JCO as such is not affected by the grant to him the honorary rank of Lieutenant and Captain, nor does the commission granting him that rank conferred any additional powers of command.
• Such Honorary Commissioned officers will take rank according to their junior commissioned rank and will accordingly be junior to all officers. the respondents are directed to fix/ re-fix the minimum pay correspondingly the pension of pre 01.01.2006 retired Captains (equivalents ranks in the Navy and Air Forces), including the petitioners by taking the minimum of the fixed for Captains as on 01.01.2006.
Such fixation shall not in any case be less than that granted to JCOs holding honorary commission of Captains.
The above directions are implemented within four months of receipt of copy of the order.
Sd/- Justice Ghanshyam Prasad
Sd/ Lt Gen NS Brar (Retd)
2. HONORARY COMMISSIONED OFFICER ARE JCO’S & JUNIOR TO REGULAR OFFICER LT/CAPT. BUT IN 6TH CPC HONORARY OFFICER[CLASS-II] HAVE BEEN EQUATED TO CLASS-I OFFICER BY PLACING THEM IN PB-3 ] DISGRACE TO REGULAR LT & CAPT
3. A GRAVE BLUNDER WHICH WILL POSE ,ADMINSTRATIVE,COMMAND & CONTROL, LEGAL, FINANCIAL & LOWERING MORALE OF REGULAR OFFICER]
4. QMG HAS INSULTED OFFICER CADRE,BUT HAS ALSO INCURRED HUGE LOSS TO THE NATION THEIR IS EVASION OF EXCISE DUTY ON LIQUOR , WHICH HAS BEEN LOST &ADDITIONAL LOSS IN CSD ITEMS AS QUOTA THE PERSON INVOLVED FROM DRAFTING TO SANCTION OF LETTER[QMG] SHOULD BE PUNISHED & LOSS BE RECOVERED FROM THEIR PAY & LLOWANCES LIKE SUKHANA SCAM .
5. THE FORMATION/UNITS WHO HAVE IMPLEMENTED THE ORDER WITHOUT CONTESTING ARE ALSO PARTY TO IT
6. ONLY TWO BANDS: FOR OFFICERS
ACCN HAS TWO BANDS UP TO MAJORS [NOW LT COL DUE TO UP GRADATION OF RANK] & MAJORS & ABOVE
PAY OFFICERS HAS ALSO TWO BANDS LT TO LT COL &COL TO GEN
THAN WHY NOT HAVE TWO BANDS FOR CANTEEN/CLUB EXTRA
Officers' Band-1 : LT TO LT COL [NON RED TAPE OFFICER]NON HAG SCALE
Officers' Band-2 : COL[SELECTION] TO Gen [ RED TAPE OFFICER]HAG SCALE
7. NOW LET SEE BAND WISE:
A] Officers’ Band-1: Hony Lt, Hony Capt, Lieut to Colonel-
JCO [CLASS-II] [HONY LT/CAPT] HAS NOT ONLY BEEN EQUATED WITH CLASS-I OFFICER BUT AN OFFICER HIGHER TO SUPER TIME SCALE [COL-SELECTION] HAS ALSO BEEN EQUATED WITH JCO [HONY LT/CAPT]
B] Officers’ Band-2: Brig and Maj Gen-
A LT GEN DOES NOT THINK A MAJ GEN/BRIG IS WORTH WHILE TO BE IN HIS BAND
C] Officers’ Band-3: Lt Gen –
COAS NOT COMFORTABLE WITH LT GEN, HIGHER SCALE FROM MAJ GEN.
D] UNSPECIFIED UNLIMITED OFFICER BAND 4: COAS-
NOT SUFFICENT OOH LESS [LOVE FOR WINE xxx W
8. HAND FULL OF GENERALS ARE SNATCHING AWAY PAY, PERKS & DIGNITY OF SELECTION GRADE OFFICER’S [COL& BRIG]. ARE THEY BENT ON IN MAKING A COWARD, UNFIT ARMY, WITH POOR COMMAND & CONTROL SET UP [BY DENYING COL[SELECTION] & BRIG THEIR DUE]
9. THERE IS IMMEDIATE NEED TO REVISE THE PAY/PENSION OF selection GRADE COL/BRIG w.e.f. 1/1/2006.THEY HAVE TO BE KEPT ABOVE SUPER TIME SCALE TO MAINTAIN THEIR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF EQUALITY & NOT TO VIOLATE ARTICLE 14 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
PLACE COL [SELECTION] w.e.f IN ABOVE SUPER TIME SCALE OF IAS/IPS & RESTORE DIGNITY & HONOUR OF COMMANDING OFFICER COL [SELECTION GRADE] A KING PIN OF FIGHTING MACHINERY

K Rajamanickam said...

I have retired from the service with 16 years in Jan 1980 as Havildar Group 'B' now getting pension of Rs 4814.00 per month. I understand that my pension is increased to Rs 4837.00 as per Circular No 482. However, this is not yet implemented as yet. Most of PDAs are not aware of this, I feel. I request the authority to instruct all the PDAs for immediate action to revise the pension.

Hav/Clerk K Rajamanickam (No 6642542 ASC- rajamanickam1944@gmail.com)